ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to understand whether the one-time chair stand test (CS-1) is useful for predicting the severity of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in 101 patients admitted to the hospital with acute respiratory failure. METHODS: This single-centered, prospective observational cohort study enrolled 101 critically ill adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 who underwent the CS-1 as a dynamic evaluation tool in clinical practice between late April 2020 and October 2021. Data on demographic characteristics, symptoms, laboratory values, computed tomography findings, and clinical course after admission were collected. Furthermore, the data was compared, and the association between the intubation and non-intubation groups was determined. We also calculated the cutoff point, area under the curve (AUC), and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the change in oxygen saturation (ΔSpO2) during the CS-1. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of 101 patients (33%) were intubated during hospitalization. There was no significant difference in the resting SpO2 (93.3% versus 95.2%, P = 0.22), but there was a significant difference in ΔSpO2 during the CS-1 between the intubation and non-intubation groups (10.8% versus 5.5%, P < 0.01). In addition, there was a significant correlation between hospitalization and ΔSpO2 during the CS-1 (ρ = 0.60, P < 0.01). The generated cutoff point was calculated as 9.5% (AUC = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.88-1.00). CONCLUSION: For COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure, the CS-1 performed on admission was useful for predicting the severity of COVID-19. Furthermore, the CS-1 can be utilized as a remote and simple evaluation parameter. Thus, it could have potential clinical applications in the future.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus-related disease (COVID-19) can result in relative bradycardia; however, there are no reports on relative bradycardia in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 who require oxygen. We retrospectively investigated 45 patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 and examined the relationship between heart rate and body temperature at the time of initiating oxygen or mechanical ventilation. For three consecutive days after initiating oxygen therapy, body temperature (day's highest temperature), heart rate, and other vital signs were measured simultaneously. We checked for relative bradycardia and analyzed the differences between patients with moderate COVID-19 (oxygen requirement ≤ 5 L/min) and those with severe COVID-19 (oxygen requirement ≥ 5 L/min). Of the 45 patients, 28 and 17 had moderate and severe COVID-19, respectively. The heart rate increased with increasing body temperature, and almost all patients satisfied the criteria of relative bradycardia. In Spearman's rank correlation analysis, body temperature was significantly correlated with heart rate (ρ = 0.483, p = 0.012) in moderately ill patients but not in severely ill patients (ρ = 0.261, p = 0.297). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the severity of COVID-19 and body temperature were independent predictors of heart rate. The predicted change in heart rate was 6.0 beats/min for each 1 °C rise in body temperature. Relative bradycardia was suggested to be a characteristic finding in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 who require oxygen. Additionally, severely ill patients were more likely to develop relative bradycardia than moderately ill patients. Focusing on the relationship between heart rate and body temperature might help clinicians diagnose this disease in patients with worsening respiratory failure.